Banning – Challenge to Truth
What do you think? Write to pthorp.ed@votf.org

David Lorenz is in the VOTF Bowie, Maryland affiliate. The affiliate whose representative testified at the hearings last year, as noted above, has not been advised of any change to their meeting on parish property.

Bannings and silencings have been standard procedure for generations in many a government and, sadly, in our Church. While both are hurdles, they are hurdles to be overcome. History remains on the side of truth-telling just as our faith tradition also remains on the side of our prophets. Then – as now – it seems that the people of God are being called to address yet another roadblock to a healthier faith community.

A member of VOTF Maryland testified a year ago against the expressed preference of diocesan leadership (Cardinal McCarrick, Washington, DC diocese – separate from the diocese of Baltimore, MD). She spoke at a Maryland State House hearing in support of extending the statute of limitations, as did over a dozen other groups. The only speaker against the bill was the Maryland Catholic Conference, the diocesan lobby group. Last week, the David Lorenz, an affiliate leader, was advised by his pastor that contrary to the past two years, the affiliate would no longer have the use of the parish property for meetings. Lorenz also learned that the diocese would quietly and slowly advise all the parishes in the diocese to ban VOTF from meeting on Church property. The affiliate was told that the reason given by the chancery was the testimony noted above. Nearly a dozen attempts by affiliate leaders, via email and phone calls to the parish office, did not produce one response. The pastor has elected not to confront diocesan leadership.

Church officials have been using Eucharist as a tool to enforce conformity among politicians who support laws contrary to Church teachings. Earlier in VOTF history, dioceses and parishes chose to deny VOTF parishioners the use of church property for meetings, because those officials believed VOTF had some sort of hidden agenda (handily dismissed by the recent VOTF Study by D’Antonio et al.) or they suspected that VOTF was challenging dogma (thus the Statement of Beliefs on our web site). Clearly, the problem lies not with any hidden agenda but the one that is out there, and has been, for nearly four years – accountability. Accountability to survivors means justice for what the Church did to them – regardless of dates; accountability among priests means integrity in their ministry; accountability in Church leadership means transparency in financial dealings and other decisions that impact Catholics; accountability among laity means accepting the responsibility of and right to meaningful involvement in Church governance.

VOTF Maryland will continue to meet. They and supporters will wear red to Mass one Sunday a month. They will continue to discuss their options and continue to speak out for justice and accountability. Lorenz contacted other parish-based VOTF groups and learned that, as yet, they have not been banned from the use of their church property for VOTF meetings.



In the Vineyard
November 17, 2005
Volume 4, Issue 16
Printer Friendly Version

Page One

VOTF National Representative Council


Officer Nominations


Survivors support survivors


COMMENTARY

REFLECTION


Donate

Join VOTF

Contact Us 

Archives


VOTF Home

For an overview of press coverage of VOTF, click here.
©Voice of the Faithful 2005.All Rights Reserved