AFFILIATE Updates

This is a progress report from VOTF Cleveland, OH on Senate Bill 17, which would “…require clergy to report known or reasonably suspected abuse or neglect of a child by any other member of the clergy.”(VOTF Cleveland, OH web site – www.votf.cleveland.org) This is the bill that was passed by the Ohio State Senate in March 2005 and was then sent to the House. The bill’s author is Senator Robert Spada. The following update comes from VOTF’s Tom Byrne.

Parental groups and one teaching association are endorsing SB-17. The House Judiciary Committee is chaired by John R. Williamowski of Lima, OH (Toledo diocese). Because of an economic downturn the Republican-controlled legislature said they wanted to focus on business items and let “social” concerns wait until after election day on Nov. 8. Yet Williamowski has scheduled a hearing for Nov. 10 for “constitutionality” issues on this. Both SNAP and VOTF are very concerned this might be a method to let the bill “die-in-committee.” The State Senator who has worked on this for 3+ yrs is Bob Spada, who has joined VOTF and was in Indianapolis in July. Law enforcement groups are now endorsing passage, notably the Buckeye State Sheriffs Association. We would like to get all VOTF members in the state to write to Williamowski. VOTF National has given us direction as to how to accomplish this via e-mail. Disgraceful but true – all six Ohio dioceses are actively lobbying against this.


RCAB News – from a report to the Pilot, the Boston archdiocese newspaper.
The following is provided by David Castaldi

To All Members Of The Boston Archdiocese,

On August 11, 2005, Boston newspapers reported that the Vatican’s Congregation for the Clergy has taken the position that the Archdiocese erred in claiming the assets of suppressed parishes. The Rev. Mark O’Connell, an Archdiocesan Canon Lawyer, is familiar with the suppression decrees and the discussions between Archbishop Seán O’Malley and Vatican officials. Fr. O’Connell and the Archbishop are meeting with pastors and finance councils of the affected parishes.

Fr. O’Connell recently provided an overview of the issues concerning the suppression decrees to The Parish Reconfiguration Fund Oversight Committee (PRFOC). Key points of discussion are summarized below:

  1. The Congregation for the Clergy has not yet issued a ruling. A draft of a possible ruling has been circulated between Vatican and Archdiocesan officials.
  2. Future rulings are expected to uphold Archbishop O’Malley’s suppression of closed parishes and the procedure he used for the suppressions.
  3. The Congregation for the Clergy has reviewed the facts of the cases sent to them in Rome. In response to cases of territorial parishes, in which the decree of suppression designates the territory of the suppressed parish to go to another parish, they have determined that there is an issue in the way the decrees are drafted. Although the suppression could be upheld, the assets from these parishes would go to the receiving parishes, rather than the Archdiocese of Boston.
  4. The Congregation for the Clergy recognizes the original intent of the decrees and offered Archbishop O’Malley a suggestion to bring about the intended results. The Archbishop is meeting with the pastors and their finance councils personally and through Fr. O’Connell, to request they designate their suppressed parish assets be sent to the Archdiocese. The Archbishop asserts that he has been clear since the beginning that suppressed assets will be sent to the Archdiocese “to be redistributed for the greater mission of the Archdiocese.”
  5. The Archbishop committed to the pastors that he will fund any expenses directly related to the receiving of new parishioners.
  6. The Parish Reconfiguration Fund Committee does not know if the Congregation of the Clergy will accept a late appeal from parishes that did not appeal their closure. The Congregation of the Clergy has wide discretion as to whether it will continue to accept the late appeals of concerned parishes.
  7. Ethnic parishes are not included in the ongoing discussions because the Congregation for the Clergy has indicated these decrees are properly executed.
  8. The Archdiocese is modifying all new and existing decrees dating from May 2005, to rectify the issue.

The Parish Reconfiguration Fund Oversight Committee does not have any information that would suggest that the Congregation for the Clergy will overturn any closure decision. Discussions continue between the Archdiocese and the affected pastors to resolve the matter concerning the assets.

Respectfully submitted,

The Parish Reconfiguration Fund Oversight Committee:
David L. Castaldi, Chair, Central Region
Maureen Corcoran, Central Region
Joseph F. Finn, Jr., Archdiocesan Finance Council, West Region
Nan-Marie Jaeger, South Region
Norman Sabbey, West Region
Kathleen Rabe, North Region
Timothy J. Schiavoni, Merrimack Valley Region

The Parish Reconfiguration Fund Oversight Committee (PRFOC) is composed of independent, volunteer Catholics charged with the responsibility of providing oversight and advice on the financial aspects of parish reconfiguration.



In the Vineyard
November 3, 2005
Volume 4, Issue 15
Printer Friendly Version

Page One

VOTF Affiliate Highlights


Message from Jim Post


Letters to the Editor


Witness in Washington

Interview with VOTF Phila. member Richard Taylor, author of a forthcoming book Love in Action

Review of The Priesthood of the Faithful – Key to a Living Church by Fr. Paul J. Philibert.

Report from VOTF Board of Trustees

RCAB News


Donate

Join VOTF

Contact Us 

Archives


VOTF Home

For an overview of press coverage of VOTF, click here.
©Voice of the Faithful 2005.All Rights Reserved