homecontactjoindonate

 

Letters to the Editor
Please write to leaderpub@voiceofthefaithful.org

"According to the New York Times, 'The nation's Roman Catholic bishops approved a statement on Friday on "Catholics in Political Life" that brands politicians who support abortion rights as "cooperating in evil" and leaves the door open for bishops to deny communion to such lawmakers.'

It's too bad they didn't include in their statement the bishops who transferred and sheltered pedophiles, because those bishops certainly "cooperated in evil," they even facilitated it.

The bishops should have suggested that their own members should be forbidden to take communion until they had examined their consciences, including their 'fidelity to the moral teaching of the church in personal and public life.'

The article also stated that 'The bishops also asserted unequivocally that "the Catholic community and Catholic institutions" should not give "awards, honors or platforms" to Catholics who "act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles." Of course that statement did not refer to the Pope's giving Cardinal Law the title of Archpriest of the Roman basilica of St. Mary Major.

Are we the only ones who see our Church doing things that it condemns? Are we the only ones who see a double standard being applied, one for the clergy and another for the laity?" Bill Scott


"Re your mention in the June issue of 'at will' employment policy in various parishes and dioceses:

Our vicar came in to our school office with an auxiliary bishop two years ago, middle of June, and told the principal he wasn't going to have his contract renewed. He was told he'd have a review. Nobody from the Chancery ever called him about when the review would be. He found out minutes before the review, made it over (it was just in the parish office), virtually had no questions answered, and his contract was not renewed. Our parish council sent documents to the chancery, phone calls were made. Nobody could do anything because what the vicar and bishop did was outside the 'process.' As a result, we had no recourse and lost our most wonderful principal. Our enrollment went from 250 (which took us 4-5 years to build) back down to about 110.

They also summarily sent our pastor at the time to another parish. Our pastor also could do nothing. Understanding priests are reassigned regularly, this wasn't quite as big an issue, but there was no warning. Thank God we received a wonderful new pastor - but we wonder about the "process."

There were many other incidents that demonstrate just how 'power corrupts.' This is why I'm a VOTF member." Caroline M. Ezop


"As a PGK and GDK-Elect of a K of C council in the Brooklyn diocese, the same diocese who had the illustrious privilege of having ex-Bostonian Bishop Thomas Daily at the helm, I, too, am still profoundly amazed at the sterling silence from K of C Supreme Headquarters in New Haven, CT.

Amazed as it regards both the issue of priestly misconduct and the alleged cover-ups of same by various members of the hierarchy, as well as having a tainted member of the hierarchy serving as Supreme Chaplain. The acquiescence by silence of the K of C 'dignitaries' in these situations is perplexing, but does serve as perhaps the ultimate example of ignorance is bliss, and an example of how some people's actions can mirror those of the lemming as they saunter over the cliff.

And while it may be analogous to re-arranging the deck chairs on the HMS Titanic, the notion that there was nobody with sufficient PR savvy to suggest that Bishop Thomas Daily submit his resignation as Supreme Chaplain of the K of C, even if for 'personal reasons,' and timed to coincide with the submission of his letter of resignation to the Holy Father, is a stellar example of just how far out of touch some of the supremely ignorant can be. It's disgusting, it's a disservice to the good name of Fr. Michael J. McGivney, the founder of the K of C, and it's insulting to the membership.

That said, I have decided to remain in the K of C, if for no other reasons than that I like my fellow Brothers and it's better to be inside looking around and seeing first hand what is going on-working for change, than it is to be on the outside, looking in, voiceless, but for the Voice of the Faithful and its courageous members." Edward B. (Woody) Ryder IV, PGK


"Thank you for your wonderful service. Parishes are closing because of the imposition of monastic celibacy on the parish clergy - something that was not done during much of early Church history. Isn't the caste system (hierarchy, clergy, laity) dysfunctional for the Body of Christ and for the telling of the Good News of Jesus to all nations? Shouldn't the words of consecration at the Lord's Supper simply be said by the whole group together?" Dr. Bernard Lammers, Professor of Public Law &Government, St. Lawrence University, Canton NY


"It is well past the time for Catholics to stop seeing themselves as victims of an uncaring hierarchy as regards church closings, and time to step up and take some control of their parishes. The planned closings present a clear opportunity for the laity to begin to exert control over the governance of their church. Success in achieving such a meaningful structural change could provide the model for long-term health and well being of the Church.

Those parishes that are affected should organize and plan to either buy the church buildings or find alternative space that they can rent for Mass and other liturgical functions. If the church is truly its people and not just a collection of buildings, this is the time for leaders to step forward and work with lay people and clergy to decide the direction they want to take. Involvement of the clergy should be strongly encouraged and would be represent a real partnership of two parts of the Church that have not always been in perfect harmony.

Some parishes have significant wealth; most if not all of them have educated parishioners who are capable of leading and guiding such an effort. This in no way implies any infringement on the authority of the clergy in matters of faith and morals, but it clearly means a strong leadership role for the laity in the governance of the Church at the parish level. As has been pointed out in Vatican II, Catholics have a right and responsibility for their Church - what better time to begin to exercise that responsibility.

VOTF can be a catalyst in the effort to lead such a change. As a member of VOTF I would urge all parishes, not just those currently impacted by church closings, to consider taking a stronger role in the governance of their parishes. If people truly want to retain their parish, they have the opportunity to work to make this happen.

The planned closings are also an opportunity for VOTF to demonstrate strong leadership in driving needed change in the church. Structural change is one of VOTF's stated goals; now is the time to give it real meaning." Mike Duhigg

 


Peter Kaufman, VOTF Melbourne, Australia submitted to the Vineyard his letter published in The Age in Melbourne in response to the Salesian order's move out of the jurisdiction of Victoria a priest charged with sex abuse. Peter notes that two more offenders have since come to light.

"Rogue priests must not evade the law: Australian members of Voice of the Faithful welcome your editorial (23/6) calling for Catholic Church authorities to deal with priests charged with crimes in accordance with the law. The Church has, on several occasions in the past, moved clergy beyond the reach of civil authorities when allegations have been raised about crimes such as sexual assault. It is as though some Church authorities are living in a parallel universe in which criminal law does not apply to them. In this alternative world, indecent assault, rape and other crimes become 'sexual or professional misconduct' or 'moments of weakness.' With cavalier disregard for the wider community that the Church claims to serve, the Church moves offenders beyond reach of the law. Voice of the Faithful are Catholics who want our Church to be healthy. We want to change the way some things are done so that everyone in the Church is accountable and, hence, responsible. We urge our Church leaders to review the way appointments are made, consult communities and help restore our pride in the Church." Peter Kaufman, Altona Meadows.

 

 

Voice of the Faithful, VOTF, "Keep the Faith, Change the Church,"
Voice of Compassion, VOTF logo(s), Parish Voice, and
Prayerful Voice are trademarks of Voice of the Faithful, Inc.

Voice of the Faithful is a 501(c) 3 tax-exempt organization.

 

In the Vineyard
July 2004
Volume 3, Issue 7

Page One

Parish Voice News

Reports From the Field

Letters to the Editor

Events, Opportunities & News

Making a Joyful Noise

Printer Friendly Version (WORD)

In the Vineyard Archives

Our postal address is VOTF,
Box 423,
Newton, MA
02464-0002

Donations can be sent to this address or through our Web site

For an overview of press coverage of VOTF, click here.

REMINDER: To contact an affiliate in your area, just go to the VOTF Web site at www.votf.org and click on Parish Voices for a menu. Choose "Directory," identify your state by region, click appropriately and you're there.