COMMENTARY

Survivor Support: Setting the Record Straight
VOTF president Jim Post

VOTF Supports Anonymity Protection for Survivors

Sexual abuse is difficult for survivors to talk about. As the recent example of Bishop Thomas Gumbleton illustrates, it can take decades before a survivor of sexual abuse is ready to publicly discuss his or her experience. This reality impacts when allegations are filed and how they are received by officials.

The psychological barriers associated with public disclosure can be overcome, in part, by making the process safe for victims. Sadly, the Catholic Church does not have a good record on this matter and has too often made it difficult for those who wish to file claims. As the National Review Board’s Robert Bennett said, too often the church has “re-victimized” those who file allegations with church authorities.

One important safeguard for survivors who wish to file their allegations with authorities is the protection of their anonymity. Attorneys, social workers, and survivors themselves confirm that anonymity is a crucial protection.

It was recently reported that VOTF was sympathetic to elimination of anonymity.
This is untrue. To my knowledge, no VOTF affiliate group, officer, or decision making body, has ever urged the abandonment of this important protection. Moreover, I would personally try to convince them of the need for, and wisdom of, this protection.

To summarize,

  1. Voice of the Faithful does not support eliminating the anonymity protection of those who file allegations.

  2. Voice of the Faithful has consistently urged the Catholic Church to create a system that respects the privacy and confidentiality of those who file allegations.
    We have publicly urged church officials to eliminate the re-victimization about which Robert Bennett and the National Review Board expressed concern.

  3. Church officials have an obligation to investigate the veracity of all claims. In that process, the rights of the defendant should be protected. Historically, however, the system has been skewed toward protecting priests by devaluing or ignoring the testimony of victim/survivors. Church officials have an obligation to protect both parties, not only one. Their goal should be to ascertain the truth.

  4. Experience suggests that there are few false allegations. Diocesan attorneys, as well as those who represent survivors, suggest that less than 5% of all allegations are false; many say that only 1 or 2% are false.

Voice of the Faithful supports survivors of clergy sexual abuse. Today, when there are many proposals to create or amend legislation, the protection of anonymity remains one of the fundamental steps every diocese and jurisdiction should take to ensure a safe environment for those who seek justice within the Church.



In the Vineyard
January 26, 2006
Volume 5, Issue 2
Printer Friendly Version

Page One

Letters to the Editor

 

COMMENTARY


Donate

Join VOTF

Contact Us 

Archives


VOTF Home

For an overview of press coverage of VOTF, click here.
©Voice of the Faithful 2006.All Rights Reserved